Landlord is not under a duty to mitigate loss in relation to rent arrears

Reichman and Dunn v Beveridge and Gauntlett, 13 December 2006 (Court of Appeal).

The tenants left the premises during the term of the lease and stopped paying the rent. The landlords sued the tenants for the rent arrears. The tenants argued that the landlords should have mitigated their loss of rent by forfeiting the lease and re-letting the premises.

The Court of Appeal has confirmed that a landlord is not under a duty to mitigate its loss of rent where a tenant gives up possession of the premises and fails to pay rent.
PLC Property

Register for free access

To access this resource and thousands more, register for a free, no-obligation trial of Practical Law. Register using the button below, telephone +44 (0)20 7202 1220 or e-mail info@practicallaw.com.

A free trial will give you:

Unlimited access to Practical Law online know-how
Thousands of market standard documents and clauses
Daily alerts and weekly update e-mails on key legal developments in your practice area
 

Register

Log in

To access this resource, log in below or register for free access.

Contact us

Our customer services team are available every working day 8.30am to 7pm (GMT).

{ "siteName" : "PLC", "objType" : "PLC_Doc_C", "objID" : "1247248172226", "objName" : "Landlord is not under a duty to mitigate loss in relation to ren", "userID" : "2", "objUrl" : "http://publicsector.practicallaw.com/cs/Satellite/6-207-9022?q=&qp=&qo=&qe=", "pageType" : "", "contentAccessed" : "false", "analyticsPermCookie" : "2bd45024:13eb782771c:-5641", "analyticsSessionCookie" : "2bd45024:13eb782771c:-5640", "statisticSensorPath" : "http://analytics.practicallaw.com/sensor/statistic" }