| 1 | CEIOPS press release: Preparatory Field Study among Life ... | External resources | 23-Sep-2005 |
| 2 | CEIOPS: Recommendation on possible need for amendments ... | External resources | 02-Nov-2005 |
| 3 | Commission Directive 2007/14/EC of 8 March 2007 laying ... published in the Official Journal on 9 March 2007 (OJ L 69, 9.3.2007, p. 27). | Policy guidance and consultations | 09-Mar-2007 |
| 4 | Distance Marketing Directive The Financial Services Authority is consulting on the implementation of the directive concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services in the UK. | Legal update: archive | 25-Sep-2003 |
| 5 | Edgar for UK companies: The new filing requirements On 25th September, 2001 the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed rule amendments that will require non-US companies to use the SEC electronic filing system EDGAR instead of submitting paper documents. | Legal update: archive | 29-Jan-2002 |
| 6 | Equivalence of Canadian and South Korean GAAPs to IFRS ... On 7 April 2008 the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) published for consultation a technical advice on the equivalence of Canadian and South Korean GAAPs to EU adopted International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The Prospectus Directive (2003/71/EC) and the Transparency Directive (2004/109/EC) require the Commission to establish by mid-2008 whether the GAAP of a given non-EU country is equivalent to IFRS (see PLC Legal update, Prospectus and Transparency Directives: final Commission Regulation establishing a mechanism for determining equivalence of third countries' GAAP to IFRS). The Commission has requested CESR to provide advice to it in respect of Canadian, Indian and South Korean GAAPs. CESR is still in the process of evaluating Indian GAAP and the use of IFRS in India. In this consultation it seeks views on its conclusions that it should recommend the Commission to accept both Canadian and South Korean GAAPs as equivalent for these purposes. CESR invites feedback by 25 April 2008. | Legal update: archive | 07-Apr-2008 |
| 7 | Equivalence of US, Japanese and Chinese GAAP to IFRS ... On 31 March 2008, the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) published its advice to the European Commission on the equivalence of US, Japanese and Chinese GAAP to EU adopted International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The advice reflects the December 2007 consultation paper (see PLC Legal update, Equivalence of Chinese, Japanese and US GAAPs to IFRS: CESR consultation ) with CESR recommending that the Commission: (1) Find US GAAP equivalent to IFRS. (2) By June 2008 should consider Japanese GAAP equivalent to IFRS unless there is no adequate evidence of the Accounting Standards Board of Japan achieving the timetable agreed with the IASB to accelerate convergence between Japanese GAAP and IFRS (the Tokyo Agreement). (3) Postpone a final decision on Chinese GAAP until there is more information on the application of the new Chinese accounting standards by Chinese issuers. The first complete reporting period under the new Chinese standards will only be for 2007 accounting periods and CESR believes that evidence of adequate implementation is important in the context of an outcome-based definition of equivalence. CESR intends to undertake additional work to assess whether Chinese GAAP has been properly applied by Chinese issuers. Background: the Prospectus (2003/71/EC) and Transparency (2004/109/EC) Directives require the Commission to establish by mid-2008 whether the GAAP of a given non-EU country is equivalent to IFRS. Regulation (EC) No 1 | Legal update: archive | 31-Mar-2008 |
| 8 | ESMA Prospectuses: Questions and Answers (ESMA FAQs) | Glossary | Maintained |
| 9 | ESMA Questions and Answers on Short Selling (ESMA Short ... | Glossary | Maintained |
| 10 | European Commission letter to CEIOPS on Solvency II ... | External resources | 02-Jun-2006 |
| 11 | European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) | Glossary | Maintained |
| 12 | Federal Court jurisdiction | Legal update: archive | 05-Apr-2001 |
| 13 | Financial reporting: SEC abolishes requirement for non-US ... On 15 November 2007 the SEC announced that it had decided to amend its rules to allow foreign private issuers in the US to file financial statements prepared under IFRS without reconciliation to US GAAP. The rule amendments will take effect 60 days after they are published in the Federal Register and will apply to financial statements covering years ended after 15 November 2007. The IASB welcomes the change as an important step towards achieving its goal of developing "a single, high-quality language for financial reporting that is accepted through the world's capital markets". Countries that have already adopted IFRS include the EU countries, Hong Kong, Australia and South Africa. Countries who have announced a timetable for adopting IFRS, or converging their national accounting standards with IFRS, include India, Japan, Korea, Brazil and Canada. | Legal update: archive | 16-Nov-2007 |
| 14 | Financial Services Action Plan (FSAP) | Glossary | Maintained |
| 15 | Financial Services Authority (FSA) (UK) The FSA is the regulator for the UK financial services industry and the competent authority for listing in the UK (UKLA). The site contains a wide range of materials, including the FSA Handbook. | External resources | -- |
| 16 | Foreign issuers and US courts: beware the long arm of the law Although non-US observers commonly fret about the possible export of US-style class actions and US-style pre-trial discovery abroad, foreign issuers should also be concerned about US courts importing foreign plaintiffs and foreign issuers. Where conduct material to an alleged fraud has occurred in the US, foreign plaintiffs can join together to sue there, regardless of where they acquired their securities. | Articles | 31-May-2006 |
| 17 | Market Abuse Directive (MAD) | Glossary | Maintained |
| 18 | Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) | Glossary | Maintained |
| 19 | NASDAQ Stock Market | Glossary | Maintained |
| 20 | OFEX | Glossary | Maintained |
| 21 | Prospectus Directive | Glossary | Maintained |
| 22 | Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Glossary | Maintained |
| 23 | Standard & Poor's 500 index (S&P 500) | Glossary | Maintained |
| 24 | Transparency directive | Glossary | Maintained |
| 25 | Transparency Directive: final decision to postpone the ... On 6 December 2006 the Commission announced that, in addition to the regulation to amend the Prospectus Regulation (see PLC Legal update, Prospectus Regulation: final regulation to postpone the equivalence decision), it had adopted its final decision pursuant to the Transparency Directive to extend by 2 years the transitional exemption granted to certain third country issuers from the obligation to prepare annual or half-yearly financial statements in accordance with IFRS (for background see PLC Legal update, Transparency Directive and Prospectus Regulation: draft decision and regulation to postpone the equivalence decision). The final decision was published in the Official Journal on 8 December 2006. | Legal update: archive | 06-Dec-2006 |
| 26 | Transparency Directive: final implementing measures adopted ... On 9 March 2007 the final directive to implement various provisions of the Transparency Directive was published in the Official Journal, after being adopted by the Commission on 8 March 2007 (for background, see PLC Legal update, Transparency Directive: Commission draft implementing measures). The FSA has advised that it was operating on the basis of the final text of the Level 2 measures when drafting the final DTRs. The FSA brought the Level 2 measures into force on 20 January 2007 (see PLC Legal update, Transparency Directive: FSA publication of final rules), notwithstanding that Member States have until 8 March 2008 to implement them. The FSA has further advised that it has no plans to make amendments to the DTRs at this stage, but will review the final implementing Directive to clarify its position on the matter. (For general background on the Transparency Directive, see PLC Practice note, Implications of the Transparency Directive for publicly traded companies.) | Legal update: archive | 09-Mar-2007 |